MAIN


©1996-2018. All Rights Reserved. Online Journal of Veterinary Research . You may not store these pages in any form except for your own personal use. All other usage or distribution is illegal under international copyright treaties. Permission to use any of these pages in any other way besides the before mentioned must be gained in writing from the publisher. This article is exclusively copyrighted in its entirety toOJVR.This article may be copied once but may not be, reproduced or re-transmitted without the express permission of the editors. This journal satisfies the refereeing requirements (DEST) for the Higher Education Research Data Collection (Australia). Linking:To link to this page or any pages linking to this page you must link directly to this page only here rather than put up your own page.


OJVRTM
Online Journal of Veterinary Research©
Volume 17 (11):669-674, 2013. Redacted 2017.


 Intestinal survival of simple and microencapsulated Lactobacilus acidophilus: Response to inulin consumption in broiler chickens

 

Seyedeh Leila Poorbaghi1* (DVM), Hamid Reza Gheisari2 (PhD), Habibollah Dadras1 (PhD)

 

1Department(s) of Avian Medicine and 2 Food hygiene, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

 

ABSTRACT

 

Poorbaghi SL, Gheisari HR, Dadras D., Intestinal survival of simple and microencapsulated Lactobacilus acidophilus: Response to inulin consumption in broiler chickens, Onl J Vet Res., 17 (11):669-674, 2013. Survival of simple and microencapsulated probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus) in the intestine of broiler chickens and changes in response to prebiotic (inulin) consumption was investigated. Six groups of 20 day old Cobb-500 chicks each received 109 CFU/bird of microencapsulated or simple probiotic on day 0 and 17 by gavage. Prebiotic was used in rate of 0.1% of food weight, daily, in drinking water for 35 consecutive days. Fresh fecal sampling was done on days 20 and 35 and fecal bacteria concentrations were evaluated by using MRS agar culture. The number of colonies grown on MRS agar revealed that simultaneous use of simple probiotic and prebiotic increased survival rate of bacteria compared with each one alone (5.91Í1011 against 1.5Í1011 and 1.05Í1011 CFU per g of feces, respectively). The number of fecal bacteria in response to microencapsulated probiotic (9.31Í1011 CFU per g of feces) and microencapsulated synbiotic (1.14Í1012 CFU per g of feces) increased significantly  compared with controls, pre-biotic and simple probiotic treated groups. The results suggest that microencapsulation of bacteria may have induced greater bacterial resistance to chemical and physical conditions in the gastrointestinal tract and increased bacterial survival rate

 

Key words: Lactobacillus acidophilus, microencapsulation, inulin, bacterial culture, broiler poultry.


MAIN

 

FULL-TEXT(SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE ARTICLE)