BACK TO MAIN PAGE


©1994-2018 All Rights Reserved. Online Journal of Veterinary Research. You may not store these pages in any form except for your own personal use. All other usage or distribution is illegal under international copyright treaties. Permission to use any of these pages in any other way besides the before mentioned must be gained in writing from the publisher. This article is exclusively copyrighted in its entirety to OJVR publications. This article may be copied once but may not be, reproduced or re-transmitted without the express permission of the editors.


OJVRTM

Online Journal of Veterinary Research©

 Volume 9 (1): 24-36, 2005. Redacted 2018.


Stress and pain assessment of velvet antler removal from Elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) and Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus)

 

1Cook NJ, 1Church JS, 2Schaefer AL, 3Webster JR, 3Matthews LR, 4Suttie JM

 

1Alberta Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Livestock Welfare Unit, Lacombe Research Centre, 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada, T4L 1W1 2Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lacombe Research Centre, Alberta, Canada.3AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand 4AgResearch Ltd., Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.

 

ABSTRACT

 

Cook NJ, Church JS, Schaefer AL, Webster JR, Matthews LR, Suttie JM, Stress and pain assessment of velvet antler removal from Elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) and Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Onl J Vet Res.,  9(1):24-36, 2005. This paper reviews the common data from six studies that have assessed methods of analgesia for removal of velvet antler using comparative measures of stress responses. Measurement parameters included plasma and salivary cortisol concentrations, infrared thermography of radiated heat losses and behavioral responses recorded as aversive reactions to nick tests on the antler and to cutting antler. In general, sampling occurred before and after cutting of antler and data are reduced to pre-cut and post-cut levels for ease of comparison among different studies. The data presented demonstrate that sensitive measurement of adrenocortical and metabolic activity can distinguish pain responses from the confounding influence of other stressors. This being the case, these studies indicate that removal of antler without analgesia is painful and an effective analgesic technique should be applied. Electrical analgesia (EA) is ineffective and its application caused pain in some animals. The combined evidence suggests that high-tension compression is as effective as local anaesthetic (Lidocaine®) for pain management during antler removal. These studies further indicate that the application of local anaesthetic may be more variable, and stressful to some animals, than application of compression analgesia.

 

Key Words:  Deer, velveting, analgesia, infrared thermography, salivary cortisol, behavior, welfare.


BACK TO MAIN PAGE

 

FULL-TEXT (SUBSCRIPTIONS OR PURCHASE ARTICLE)